Marking is the part of teaching that does not scale. A lecturer can deliver a brilliant lecture to 200 students and a brilliant lecture to 800. But marking 200 essays and marking 800 essays are two different jobs — and the second one is what drives sessional staff out of the academy.
The most painful version of that job is not the time it takes. It is the slow erosion of judgement under fatigue. By essay fifty, the third-marker drift sets in. By essay seventy, the rubric you wrote in week one is competing with whatever your eye is tired of looking at. By essay ninety, you have started to grade against a moving baseline you cannot name.
I built UniRubric to remove the conditions under which that judgement degrades — not to remove the lecturer. Every draft grade UniRubric produces is anchored to a verbatim phrase from your rubric and a verbatim phrase from the student's work. Nothing reaches a student until the lecturer reviews, edits, and approves. Every action is captured in a full audit trail.
The wager is that consistency at essay ninety is worth more than speed at essay one. The wager is that markers who do not burn out stay in the academy. The wager is that grades a university can defend at appeal are worth the price of an institutional contract.
We are based in Adelaide, South Australia. Our data lives in Sydney. We will never sell student work to a model trainer, including our own. If you mark essays for a university — or you decide what your university buys — I would like to hear from you directly.
— Nawras Alali
Founder & Chairman, UniRubric · nawras@unirubric.com