See your grade
before your lecturer does.
Same engine your lecturer uses. We tell you where to improve, not how to write it. Pre-check your draft against your unit's rubric, get an estimated grade, and see exactly where you can lift it.
You see it before the deadline, not weeks after. Edit, re-run, keep lifting it.
One free pre-check per month · No credit card
Same engine your lecturer will use.
Twelve hours before, not three weeks after.
A walkthrough of one PSYC2040 student running her draft through the rubric the night before submission — predicted band, criterion-by-criterion review, concrete revisions for the evening ahead.
On placement at a primary school I worked one-on-one with Sam, age seven, who had been disengaged from the morning maths lesson. I asked him what was wrong and he said "nothing." I tried again, asked if the work was hard, and he said "no." Eventually I sat next to him in silence for a minute and then asked what he had done at lunch. He started talking, and after a while mentioned that he had argued with his friend.
This taught me that with younger children, direct questions about feelings often do not work. Sam is in the late preoperational / early concrete stage and does not yet have the vocabulary to label what is bothering him in the abstract. Asking about lunch was indirect — it gave him a concrete event to anchor the conversation in, and the feelings came along with the story.
I did not handle the rest of the conversation as well as I could have. I asked him if he had told his friend he was sorry, which moved the conversation toward solving rather than understanding. Looking back, I wish I had stayed in the listening mode longer.
The encounter showed me that the indirect question is sometimes the more direct path with children at this stage. It also showed me how easy it is to slip from listening into problem-solving. Berk (2017) describes this as the parental impulse to repair, which adults often bring to interactions with children before the child has finished telling them what is wrong.
Communication Skills Reflection
On placement at a primary school I worked one-on-one with Sam, age seven, who had been disengaged from the morning maths lesson. I asked him what was wrong and he said "nothing." I tried again, asked if the work was hard, and he said "no." Eventually I sat next to him in silence for a minute and then asked what he had done at lunch. He started talking, and after a while mentioned that he had argued with his friend.
This taught me that with younger children, direct questions about feelings often do not work. Sam is in the late preoperational / early concrete stage and does not yet have the vocabulary to label what is bothering him in the abstract. Asking about lunch was indirect — it gave him a concrete event to anchor the conversation in, and the feelings came along with the story.
I did not handle the rest of the conversation as well as I could have. I asked him if he had told his friend he was sorry, which moved the conversation toward solving rather than understanding. Looking back, I wish I had stayed in the listening mode longer.
The encounter showed me that the indirect question is sometimes the more direct path with children at this stage. It also showed me how easy it is to slip from listening into problem-solving. Berk (2017) describes this as the parental impulse to repair, which adults often bring to interactions with children before the child has finished telling them what is wrong.
Honest comparison. None of the others knows the rubric the lecturer in your unit will mark you on.
Grammarly
Checks your grammar.It does not know your unit's rubric.
Quillbot
Reshuffles your sentences.It does not score your draft against the criteria you'll be marked on.
ChatGPT
Will write paragraphs for you.Which is what your lecturer is looking for. And what your university's policy is against.
UniRubric
Knows your unit's rubric. Same engine your lecturer marks with.Tells you where you'd score, criterion by criterion. The lift comes from you.
A real estimate of your grade,
plus the feedback to lift it.
- 01
Estimated grade per criterion
Not a vibe. A score against each line of your unit's rubric, with the rubric phrase that scored you and the phrase from your own writing that triggered it.
- 02
What's working
One or two strengths per criterion. Specific to your text — not generic praise.
- 03
What to fix
Two to five concrete improvements per criterion. The exact moves that would lift you from credit to distinction, or distinction to high distinction.
- 04
Try again
Edit, re-run. The pre-check is for you, not your lecturer. Nothing you do here is shared with your unit until you submit through your university.
You'll get specific feedback.
You won't get sentences to paste in.
UniRubric is a feedback tool, not a ghost-writer. It tells you where your work falls against your rubric — strengths, weaknesses, the moves that would lift you a grade. It does not write paragraphs you can paste back in. The work stays yours. So does the lift.
Your pre-checks are private. Nothing you run here is shared with your unit, your lecturer, or anyone at your university until you submit through their system.
Cheap enough to run on every assignment. No subscription traps.
Free
$0foreverOne pre-check per month, on us. No credit card required to start.
Premium
$6per monthFive pre-checks each month. Top-up pre-checks at $1 each. Six-month rollover on anything you don't use.
Pay-as-you-go
$1.50per checkNo subscription. Just one-off pre-checks when you need them — exam season, the big paper, a final draft.