Inside the LMS your faculty
already use.
UniRubric is a marking assistant for higher education. It embeds inside Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard, drafts a grade against your rubric the moment a student submits, and waits for the lecturer to review, edit, and approve before anything reaches the student.
UniRubric reads each student submission against your rubric and drafts a per-criterion grade with quoted evidence, so the lecturer’s job is to review the draft — not to mark the cohort from scratch.
Four moments. Each one sits where the institution already does the work — not in a parallel tool.
- 01
A student submits in the LMS they already use
Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard. The student clicks Submit on the assignment they were always going to submit. Nothing else changes for them. No new login, no new tool, no extra step.
- 02
UniRubric drafts the grade overnight
The moment the submission is received, UniRubric reads it against the rubric the lecturer attached to the assignment. It produces a per-criterion score, an overall grade, and a paragraph of feedback for each criterion — every score linked to a verbatim phrase from the rubric and a verbatim phrase from the student's work.
- 03
The lecturer opens a marking job, not an empty grade book
When the lecturer opens the marking job in the LMS the next morning, every submission already has a draft. They scan the rubric-anchored evidence, edit anything they disagree with, and approve. Marking eighty submissions becomes reviewing eighty drafts. The cognitive load of starting from scratch is gone; the lecturer's judgement is still in charge of every grade.
- 04
Approved grades flow back to your gradebook
When the lecturer clicks Approve, the grade and the feedback push back through LTI Advanced Gradeable Services to the institution's gradebook. The student sees it where they always check, in the system the institution already runs.
A grade the student can understand,
criterion by criterion.
The student sees the overall grade and a paragraph of feedback per rubric criterion. Each paragraph names the rubric phrase their work was scored against and quotes the phrase from their own submission that the criterion was matched to. They can see where they hit the criterion, where they missed it, and what would lift the score next time.
No black-box scoring. No “the AI said so.” The rubric is the contract; UniRubric just makes the evidence-to-rubric link explicit.
Six paths from here. Pick the one that matches your role.
- For lecturers →
The marking job, the LMS embed, what your students see, and pricing.
- For faculty leads →
Variance across markers, drift over the term, the moderation view.
- For Security & IT →
Architecture, tenancy, audit logging, LTI 1.3 deployment.
- For procurement →
Pricing structure, contracting workflow, the legal register.
- Reliability & validity →
How we measure UniRubric on inter-rater agreement and bias.
- Research collaboration →
How researchers partner with us on AI-impact studies.